Manual testing and automated testing, for web and mobile. We can test the app you already have, or write the test suite you never got round to.
How we test
People often ask which one to buy. The honest answer is that they do different jobs. A script will never think to try something odd. A person will never run the same 400 checks every night without missing one.
A tester uses your app the way a real person would, and writes down everything that goes wrong. This is where the strange bugs turn up, the ones nobody wrote a test for because nobody expected them.
We write code that uses your app for you. It runs on every change, takes minutes instead of days, and never gets bored on the four hundredth check. Best for the things you need to test again and again.
Tools
We pick the tool that suits your stack, not the one we used last time. If your team already uses something on this list, we use that.
AI in our testing
Testing is one of the places AI has genuinely changed the day-to-day work, and we use it properly. It has not made testers less important. It has moved them off the parts of the job that were never worth a person's time.
Give it a feature and it writes a first set of test cases. A tester reads them, throws half away and adds the ones it missed. Faster than starting from a blank page.
A manual test case becomes an automated one in minutes rather than an hour. Still read by a person before it is allowed to run.
A developer renames a button and fifty tests break. Most can now be repointed automatically. This is where most of the cost of automation used to sit.
Two hundred failures are rarely two hundred bugs. Grouping them by likely cause means we chase one problem instead of the symptoms.
Realistic customers, orders and addresses, in volume, without ever using your real data.
Reading the code and the tests together to point at the parts nothing covers. Uncomfortable reading, and useful.
Everything above is speed. None of it is judgement, and testing is mostly judgement.
A model will happily write four hundred tests. Knowing which twelve actually matter is judgement, and it comes from having seen things go wrong before.
Software can pass every check and still do the wrong thing. Somebody has to understand what your business actually needs from it.
No script has ever reported that a screen is confusing or that a form asks for the same thing twice. A person using it will, in the first five minutes.
When we tell you it is ready to ship, that is a person putting their name to it. Not a pass rate.
What you get
Not a slide deck. Files in your repository and a list you can act on.
Every check we run, written down. Your team can run them too, with or without us.
What broke, the exact steps to make it happen again, and a screenshot or video. No guessing.
The automation code sits in your repository. It is yours, and it works after we leave.
What passed, what failed, and what changed since last time. One page, plain English.
Where you can start
Common, and not a problem. We start with the handful of things that would hurt most if they broke, and grow from there.
They fail for no reason, so people stopped reading the results. We find out why and make them reliable again.
A round of manual testing before you go live. We tell you what is broken while there is still time to fix it.
A tester works alongside your developers, every sprint. Same standups, same board.
Straight answers
Your turn
Tell us what you have and what worries you. We come back with what we would test first and what it costs.